Please explain “beat the rap” in this sentence: Here’s how Trump can beat the rap on the pandemic.

My comments:

In other words, here are reasons or excuses why Donald Trump can escape punishment or rather media criticism for mishandling the coronavirus pandemic.

Trump’s incompetence vis-a-vis the coronavirus is well documented. So we’ll stick with the American expression “beat the rap”. It is, after all, a phrase that needs perhaps more than a little explanation.

First of all, to beat the rap is to escape from punishment, for some wrongdoing one’s done.

To beat is to go away or get away. Just beat it, as Michael Jackson used to sing.

They’re out to get you, better leave while you can

Don’t wanna be a boy, you wanna be a man

You wanna stay alive, better do what you can

…

So beat it, beat it, just beat it.

A rap on the other hand, is a sharp slap on the wrist or knuckles. It’s a sharp blow in comparison to slap or a tap on the hand. A boy, for example, reaches for food on the dinner table before everyone gets seated and his mom gently taps him on the wrist to remind him of table manners. A minute later, the boy does it again and the mother this time gives him a slap on the wrist. A third time the boy does this, the mother, now angry, gives him a rap on the knuckles.

Hence, figuratively, when people say someone takes a rap on the knuckles, they mean to point out that this is a rather severe punishment in comparison to a slap on the wrist or an even gentler tap or touch.

So, in short, to beat the rap is to escape some kind of severe punishment for some wrongdoing. “Escape”, of course, implies the wrongdoer deserves the punishment, either in the form of a fine, public criticism or a prison sentence, whatever.

No more ado, here are media examples culled from over the years to help us bring the point home:

1. As far as corrupt Teamster bosses from Cleveland go, Don Hahs isn’t remotely in the same league as the union’s general president during the mid to late 80s, the late Jackie Presser, a kept man of the Mob. But the discovery that Hahs likely embezzled funds has raised concerns of a federally-appointed oversight body. In a September 13 letter to International Brotherhood of Teamsters General President James P. Hoffa, the Independent Review Board (IRB) recommended that Hoffa bring embezzlement charges against Hahs, who heads the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen (BLET). Hahs, the three-member board charged, diverted more than $58,000 in BLET funds to cover personal expenses. It’s an internal matter – at least for now. But the IRB has a track record of limited patience.

The 55,000-member Locomotive Engineers’ union, headquartered in Cleveland, has been affiliated with the Teamsters since 2004. Don Hahs became president in 2001 and was re-elected four years later. During 2004-06, the Independent Review Board noted, he used more than $58,000 in BLET money to enjoy the good life, especially basketball-related. Tickets for Cleveland Cavaliers NBA games accounted for nearly $48,000 of that sum; travel expenses for his wife took up another $8,000. It will be hard for him to beat the rap, since the IRB report refers extensively to sworn member statements as well as itemized checks.

IRB Administrator John Cronin said Teamsters leadership would decide upon appropriate sanctions. Once Hoffa receives all relevant materials, he would have seven days to respond to the board and 90 days to take action. A union spokeswoman said that Hoffa “has not determined yet whether the Teamsters will hear the case or refer it back to the IRB.” If the union does bring charges, Hoffa would name a panel to hear the case and make recommendations. The Independent Review Board was created in the wake of a 1989 civil RICO consent agreement between the Teamsters and the Justice Department. Its current members are former Attorney General Benjamin Civiletti, former FBI and CIA Director William Webster, and former U.S. Attorney Joseph diGenova.

- Panel Seeks Theft Charges against Cleveland Locomotive Boss, NLPC.org, October 8, 2007.

2. Gone are those days when the local policeman would gently give you a warning and send you home if you were stopped for drunk driving. The maximum punishment in those good old days would be a ticket or a fine. However, with alarming rate of drunk driving accidents, law enforcement are taking a very strict view on drunk driving. The penalties too have become serious and will continue to be so.

If you have been drinking and driving and you get stopped by a police, there is no question that you would be taken to jail at least for a night to sober up. If this is your first offence, you will be warned, a proper report will be created and you are let off. However, the penalties for subsequent arrests for drunk driving would be far more serious. Depending on the level of alcohol in your blood, you will be punished. Many states across the US require you to submit the blood alcohol tests. If you refuse, then you are faced with a higher penalty.